Part
II
Based on the types, varieties and locations
of the programs, the following model was developed
for decision purposes.
Location:
Based upon host or faculty experience and personal
contacts. Marketability, security, expense and
popularity must also be considered
Season and Duration:
Once a location has been determined, factors
such as seasonality, site availability, expenses
and program duration must be weighed.
Nature of Program:
Will the program be static – based in one location,
or dynamic – moving from location to location?
Will it include flex time or will it have a
fixed agenda? Is a travel provider needed, or
will students handle their own travel?
Price:
With a location selected, time of year and program
duration determined, and the program nature
established, the next step is to determine a
realistic price structure.
Activities:
Is the program going to include a language or
service component? Will the curriculum include
traditional class methods or incorporate field
techniques? Will the program be specific to
Hospitality and Tourism students, or will it
be inclusive of the general university population?
Other Variables:
Program specific details should be considered,
such as:
• Partnerships with other universities in terms
of student recruiting
• Including graduate students or alumni
• Number of faculty members involved
• Use of graduate students or teaching assistants
• Inclusion of tours and guest speakers
• Degree of involvement of the host university
(if there is one)
• Excursions, such as museums and historical
site visits
• Internship or work experience component Recruiting:
After program approval is finalized, a marketing
plan is needed.
Figure 1: Study
Abroad Development Model
Part III
Purdue University:
Hospitality and Tourism Management
(HTM) Model Purdue University has an office
of International Programs. This office is involved
with many activities of which study abroad is
only one. The numbers of students participating
in study abroad programs has increased significantly
over the last few years. In 2005/2006 Purdue
had 990 students studying abroad in various
types of programs (Purdue Office Programs for
Study Abroad, 2006/2007). In its broadest sense,
Purdue has two types of program administration.
One type is managed directly through the study
abroad office. The other and most popular program
is run through academic departments. In these
programs, professors have the greatest amount
of control in terms of program development;
however, they must achieve fiscal break even
in order for them to run, so budgetary issues
are of vital importance. The Department of Hospitality
and Tourism at Purdue has been involved in study
abroad programs for approximately 20 years.
The model has been to encourage various faculty
members to take the initiative and lead programs.
Each spring a meeting is held to find out which
professors seek to lead or be involved in programs
for the following year. Academic year professors
are paid an overload while 12 month staff are
paid their normal salaries for participation
in these programs. During the past 10 years,
the HTM Department has followed a rotational
model by rotating summer programs in Australia,
Scotland, Ireland, Holland, Switzerland, and
shorter programs in Switzerland and Italy and
Denmark et cetera. The summer of 2008 will mark
the first summer program to China. The HTM Department
through their faculty have also initiated over
12 exchange programs where HTM students can
go for a semester or year or the students of
the foreign university can come to Purdue. The
department has been involved with hosted programs
in which the majority of the time was spent
using a partner university as their host. However,
many of the programs have simply spent time
in one country and were run entirely by Purdue
faculty with little or no contact with other
colleges or universities. Using another university
as host has its benefits in regards to housing,
access to educational facilities, centralized
locations, cost-savings and faculty participation.
However, if a majority of the time is spent
traveling, then the cost savings benefits are
outweighed by having to pay twice for housing.
A base of operation is valuable but not always
a necessity. Programmatic decisions often have
much more to do with the country and specific
locations, rather than simply following a set
model or format. The success of the study abroad
programs at Purdue has been based on the experience
of faculty who participate, the screening process
for students, the academic rigor of the programs
and the completeness of the programs. In addition
the participation of other academic institutions
as partners in our program has also helped a
great deal There is a good mix of classroom
as well as hands on experiences in each country
where programs have been held.
DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION
The results of this brief survey demonstrate
the diversity and variety of study abroad programs
offered by hospitality and tourism education
programs in the United States. With the increasing
number of hospitality and tourism programs throughout
the world, there has been a corresponding increase
in partnerships between U.S. schools and schools
in Europe, China, Latin America and other countries.
These partnerships have resulted in exchange
programs with both schools exchanging students
and accepting credit. Often, students in this
arrangement pay the prevailing rates of their
home institution. When hospitality and tourism
programs are contemplating new study abroad
programs, there are many questions that they
must consider. The proposed model focuses on
some of these issues. One additional issue that
schools need to focus on relates to variety
or rotation of programs. Certain programs, such
as semester or full year programs only enroll
a few students per year, drawing from the entire
student population. However, while there are
numerous summer programs involving discipline
specific areas, most hospitality programs tend
to offer only one per summer, so that they are
not competing for a limited pool of students.
Since most students have four or more summers
at the university, it is useful to offer a rotational
program in which students would have a choice
of locations changing each summer, so that there
are a variety of programs that can be promoted
throughout their academic career. This benefits
the students; however, it is more difficult
for the hospitality and tourism programs to
plan out, since they don’t always get the benefit
from the same location and similar prices year
after year. Lastly some Hospitality and Tourism
Management Programs have considered making some
form of study abroad a required part of their
programs. At Purdue it is only required for
the international option. It is however being
considered as a requirement in the curriculum
in the future. Other schools are also re-thinking
this for the future. The most important part
of research related to study abroad programs
deals with the benefits gained by
the students. Students who participate in study
abroad programs early in their academic careers
are able to incorporate what they learn through
the rest of their studies. Many students seek
additional study abroad experiences either by
participating in another summer program or going
away for a semester. Additionally
major companies recruiting at universities have
reported the value that they place on international
study activities, thus leading to better career
opportunities. Major international companies
are aware of the value of these programs in
having future managers who are well rounded
and have received exposure in an international
setting.
REFERENCES
Armstrong, G. K. (1984). Life after study abroad:
A survey of undergraduate academic and career
choices. The Modern Language Journal, 68(1),
1-6. Anastasia, K. (2004). Studying abroad:
The role of college students’ goals on the development
of cross-cultural skills and global understanding.
College Student Journal, 38(3), 87-96. Brislin,
R. W., & Kim, E. S. (2003). Cultural diversity
in people's understanding and uses of time.
Applied Psychology, 52(3), 63-382. Brizek, M.
G. & Khan. (2002). Ranking of U.S. hospitality
undergraduate programs: 2000-2001. Journal of
Hospitality and Tourism Education, 14(2), 4-8.
Brokaw, S. C. (1996). Planning, organizing,
and executing short term international exposures
for U.S. students of marketing and business:
An alternative method. Marketing Education Review,
6, 87-95. Carlson, J. S., & Widaman, K.
F. (1988). The effects of study abroad during
college on attitudes toward other cultures.
International Journal of Intercultural Relations,
12(1), 1-17. Carsello, C., & Greaser, J.
(1976). How college students change during study
abroad. College Student Journal, 10, 276-278.
Cuero-Cazurra, A, Maloney, M. M., & Manrakhan,
S. (2007). Causes of the difficulties in internationalization.
Journal of International Business Studies, 38,
709-25. Gordon, P., & Smith, D. K. (1992).
Planning, organizing and executing short term
International exposures for U.S. students of
marketing and business. Marketing Education
Review, 2, 47-56. Gordon, S. & Bonner, F.
(1998). Best practices in diversity: The student
affairs perspective. College Student Affairs
Journal, 18(1), 40-51. Gould, S. L. & Bojanic,
D. C. (2002). Exploring hospitality program
ranking. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism
Education, 14(4), 24-32. Institute of International
Education. (2007). Open doors 2007: Statistics
on international student mobility. Washington
DC: Institute of International Education. Johnson,
K. (1992). Internationalizing your marketing
course: The foreign study tour alternative.
Journal of Marketing Education, 14(2), 26-33.
Purdue Office Program of Study Abroad (2006/2007).
Study Abroad. Data Digest: 2006-2007, 104. Schuster,
C. P. (1993). Planning and implementing overseas
travel classes for executive MBA students. Marketing
Education Review, 3, 54-62. Toncar, M. F., &
Cudmore, B. V. (2000). The overseas internship
experience. Journal of Marketing Education,
22(1), 54-67. Ward, C., & Kennedy, A. (1993).
Psychological and socio-cultural adjustment
during cross-cultural transitions: A comparison
of secondary students at home and abroad. International
Journal of Psychology, 28, 129-147. |